Amol’s posterous

 

So you want to kill the cable box?

The new gadget from D-Link and Boxee is a looker, right? They got tired
of waiting for the world to plug laptops and Mac Minis into their home
theaters, I guess.

Bring the Internet to my First Screen already! (Never mind 2nd, 3rd...)

Though Boxee treads on hallowed ground, I'm afraid: hallowed by fallen
heroes who tried to attack the set-top stack.

Good news is that making a box fixes three big issues with the "download Boxee now!" approach:

1. No set-top PCs. Few people want to spend $500-750 on a PC and
dedicate it to being a media box. Consider Windows Media Center. Hence
Boxee Box. Only $200. Awesome.

2. Need a 10 ft UI. No mousing from the couch. E.g., Netflix or iTunes
on a TV screen. Painful. Boxee app on the Box is remote
control-friendly. Awesome. I think it's better than Apple's Front Row,
even before you consider it's wider content sources and social features.

3. TVs still exist. People are indeed watching video on laptops in the living room, but it's a 2nd screen. TV is still there. It's huge, and the colors are great, there are a few around the house, the live/new content is hard to get on other platforms, and 70-80% of homes already have pay TV so they don't perceive a marginal cost for it. And TVs are amazingly cheap too.

Here is what has vanquished past heroes:

1. Another box. Real estate is scarce and you have to win your spot. Cf. TiVo. When cabelcos bundled it in, game over. Also note that many nerds have PS3s, Xboxes, etc. But this just shrinks the market down to people who actually care for good media stuff. TiVo is a winner in many ways

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted by Amol Sarva 

Comments [0]

.

At McKinsey's annual alumni meeting. "In October 2008, Toyota sold 7 cars in Japan".

Sent on the go from my Peek

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted by Amol Sarva 

Comments [0]

(No subject)

Just boarded the emptiest SF-NY flight ever. The fare was $120. On American! The airport staff was literally snoozing.

Sent on the go from my Peek

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted by Amol Sarva 

Comments [0]

The first Xmas Tree of the Season chez Sanford


Complete with completely cheese-ified christmas music soundtrack.

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted by Amol Sarva 

Comments [0]

Pumpkin cheesecake pie


Looks highly promising. Nice going Urs.

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted by Amol Sarva 

Comments [0]

TwitterPeeking celebs

@questlove from Late Night and The Roots
@bonniehunt (the next Oprah - duh!)

And check out the magazine to sexy for Wal-Mart - Maxim! - this month

Sent by Peek from http://me.drwn.com

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted by Amol Sarva 

Comments [0]

Modern genealogy

   
Click here to download:
Modern_genealogy.zip (4578 KB)

Sent by Peek from http://me.drwn.com
-------------------------------------
From: Ramesh Sarva
To: Pramila@sarva.org
Subject: Pictures of my parents & next to kin.
Date: Nov 21, 9:30 AM

Ramesh Sarva , CPA, P.C.

Soft Tech Source

109-17 72 Road, #6-R

Forest Hills NY 11375

718-268-6906 Ext 16, Fax 718-575-3375

Emai: Ramesh@sarva.Org,

_____ From: bindiorder@aol.com [mailto:bindiorder@aol.com] Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 6:52 PM
To: ramesh@sarva.org
Subject: pictures for your file

-----Original Message-----
From: bindiorder@aol.com
To: BindiOrder@aol.com
Sent: Mon, Nov 9, 2009 4:37 am
Subject: pictures

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted by Amol Sarva 

Comments [0]

Twitter is real-time, Facebook is merely social #betaday

A great panel at betaday debated search on Twitter vs Facebook. Which is more important?


The web is changing from pages to posts to messages, a consensus-view at betaday that I agree with.

And since messages don't live on webpages, I think it means the webpage is dead again. Emails, tweets, statuses, API-driven events are not on pages that bots can crawl.

Twitter embodies this messages world -- fast, short, not really page-anchored. Facebook embodies something different. It's not pages either exactly -- since so much of it's world is enclosed in this application. And it's even constantly changing, in real-time.

My email changes in real-time too, but my email isn't 'the real-time web'. Twitter is. Because Twitter is the whole web in microcosmic message form. News, info, gossip, sports, stocks, chat, community, contacts, and direct communication.

Facebook isn't. It's social. It's really interesting for some things (old friends? current ones?) but not for many others. Twitter, though smaller right now, can be far more vital and fresh and useful on many more topics.

Hence, TwitterPeek. No Facebook Peek.

They both are, but one is more important. Twitter. Both for search and as content.

Sent from my Peek. See where at http://me.drwn.com

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted by Amol Sarva 

Comments [0]

Hey buddy!

Saw this today (attached) via Twitter. Awesome!

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted by Amol Sarva 

Comments [0]

TwitterPeek about to go on CNN

Loading mentions Retweet
Posted by Amol Sarva 

Comments [0]